In the realm of business valuation, harnessing the power of private sales transaction data (DMDM) opens a world of strategic insights and informed decision-making. As we delve into the nuances of pricing multiples, it’s crucial to understand not only their advantages but also the pitfalls that can arise, especially when relying solely on metrics like the median multiple.

Symmetrical data refers to a dataset that is evenly distributed around its mean, exhibiting no skewness or kurtosis. This type of data is crucial in determining pricing multiples because it provides a balanced representation of the market, allowing for more accurate comparisons between different businesses.

Valuation Multiples vs. Pricing Multiples

Valuation multiples typically refer to ratios used to value a company, such as price-to-earnings (P/E) or enterprise value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA).

Pricing multiples, on the other hand, are multiples derived from recent market transactions, such as sales of similar businesses.  Pricing multiples are often considered more reliable for valuing a specific company in a specific market context.

Disadvantages of Using the Median Multiple

While the median multiple is a commonly used metric, it has its limitations. One key disadvantage is its susceptibility to outliers. In a dataset with extreme values, the median may not accurately represent the typical pricing multiple, leading to skewed perceptions of value. Additionally, the median doesn’t account for the distribution of multiples across the dataset, potentially overlooking valuable information that could impact valuation assessments.

As a business valuation expert, using private sales transaction data (DMDM) to determine pricing multiples can provide valuable insights into the market and help attorneys make informed decisions. Here’s an introduction that might catch their attention:

Relevance of Various Pricing Multiples

To navigate these challenges and derive a more comprehensive view of valuation, considering multiple metrics such as the average, median, harmonic mean, high, and low pricing multiples becomes essential.

Average Multiple: Offers a straightforward calculation by summing all multiples and dividing by the number of observations, providing a balanced representation of the dataset.  How did the expert determine this was the better ratio to use?

Median Multiple: Useful for identifying the middle value in a sorted dataset, although caution is needed with skewed distributions or outlier-rich data.  How did the expert determine this was the better ratio to use?

Harmonic Mean: Particularly effective in scenarios where extreme values can heavily influence the result, as it gives more weight to lower multiples, thus offering a robust measure of central tendency.

High and Low Pricing Multiples: Provide insights into the range of multiples observed in the market, highlighting the spectrum of valuation scenarios and potential negotiation points.

By leveraging these diverse pricing multiples, attorneys can gain a more nuanced understanding of market dynamics, identify trends, and refine valuation strategies to better serve their clients’ interests.

Interpretation of Skewness and Kurtosis

Skewness measures the asymmetry of a distribution, with positive skewness indicating a longer tail on the right side and negative skewness indicating a longer tail on the left side. Kurtosis measures the “tailedness” of a distribution, with higher kurtosis indicating heavier tails.

Skewness becomes a problem when it distorts the mean, making it an unreliable measure of central tendency.

Kurtosis becomes a problem when it indicates extreme outliers or non-normal distributions, affecting the reliability of statistical analysis.

Determining if skewness is too great involves comparing it to standard thresholds and assessing its impact on the dataset’s representativeness and reliability.

Importance to Attorneys

Precision in Legal Cases:

Accurate valuation multiples are crucial in legal proceedings involving mergers, acquisitions, or disputes.

Financial Planning:

Attorneys use valuation concepts to advise clients on financial strategies and investment decisions.

Negotiation Support:

Understanding market dynamics and pricing multiples helps attorneys negotiate favorable deals for clients.

Risk Assessment:

Valuation metrics assist in evaluating the financial health and potential risks of businesses.


In conclusion, the determination of value, especially in litigation contexts, requires a rigorous and comprehensive approach to ensure accuracy and reliability.  Market Data for sales serve specific purpose for controlling and non-controlling stakeholder’s interests

Are you seeking expert business valuation services to strengthen your case and provide compelling evidence in litigation?  Look no further. As a seasoned business valuation expert with a deep understanding of the complexities involved in determining fair market value, I offer comprehensive solutions tailored to your specific legal needs.

I have earned a Master’s Degree in Business Valuations and apply those skills to my everyday business valuations.

Richard Claywell has been valuing closely held companies since 1985.  He has earned two of the highest designations in the business valuation field, the Certified Business Appraiser (“CBA”) and Accredited Senior Appraiser (“ASA”). Richard is a Certified Public Accountant, has a Master’s in Business Valuation (MBV), and holds ASA, CBA, ABV, ICVS, CVA, MAFF, CFD, ABAR, CVGA, and ICVS-A credentials.

I hold the Master Analyst in Financial Forensics and the Certified in Fraud Deterrence.  I have taught forensic accounting/fraud courses in the United States, China, and Taiwan.

I welcome and encourage comments and feedback. If you benefit from this series, please recommend it to your friends and colleagues and suggest they sign up to receive posts regularly.